All Forums
 Help For Easy-PC Users
 Libraries and Components
 FEATURE REQUEST - ModelSource import

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert Email Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

 
Check here to subscribe to this topic.
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
jlawton Posted - 08 Feb 2014 : 13:30:40
The library parts provided for Design Spark users via ModelSource looks like a great feature that I cannot enjoy at present with EPC.

So I'd like to be able to import RS Components Model Source library components/schematic/pcb footprints into my EasyPC library.

If not, why shouldn't I ditch EPC and use DesignSpark?


John Lawton Electronics
7   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
jlawton Posted - 10 Feb 2014 : 22:45:59
Hmm, that's as I suspected. That rather begs the question, as to who writes the licence agreements? I agree with your points regarding DS and Pulsonix import/export.

John Lawton Electronics
Iain Wilkie Posted - 10 Feb 2014 : 22:25:48
I spoke to numberone on all these issues a whole back, and was basically told it was down to license agreements. But I do agree that at the very least EPC shośld be able to import Designspark.
Also I would be interested in using Pulsonix but only if it would export to EPC

Iain
jlawton Posted - 10 Feb 2014 : 21:52:18
That may be Ian, but my point is the different products don't have an easy upgrade path, but are compartmentalised. As users we are the losers when we can't use features that a free version, DesignSpark offers.

If DesignSpark could read your EPC files your clients wouldn't even have to buy EPC. That might make commercial sense for Numberone, but why EPC can't read DesignSpark files is very disappointing.

John Lawton Electronics
Iain Wilkie Posted - 10 Feb 2014 : 18:49:07
I have been offered Pulsonix, and I am sure it is much more powerful. However a lot of my customers want to tweek their own designs after handing it over to them.
If I did it in Pulsonix then they would need to fork out a lot of cash. This is where EasyPC comes into its own, powerful enough but will not break the bank. Designspark is a shadow of EasyPC and is a toy in comparison.

Iain
jlawton Posted - 10 Feb 2014 : 14:46:19
Indeed, unless their agreement with RS prevents them from doing this which would be very unfortunate.

I find Numberone's product strategy is strange, when you consider they never suggest that I upgrade to Pulsonix from EPC. All their products seem to be kept separate and upgrade opportunities are seemingly missed.

Tragically, by making the file format incompatible they seem to have destroyed that prospect.

John Lawton Electronics
John Baraclough Posted - 10 Feb 2014 : 14:25:30
It would also be a great marketing opportunity for Number One to encourage users to upgrade from Design Spark to Easy PC.

-------------------------------------------------------
Birthdays are good for you: the more you have, the longer you live ... and I've had lots of them so I should know!
Benno Posted - 08 Feb 2014 : 20:58:19
agreed, 100%